4/18/09

Having a baby....

And no, I'm not having one.

In my mind that first requires a bf, then engagement, and then marriage, in that order. HOWEVER, I am in the midst of a baby boom! ^_^ So many people I know in my immediate circle of friends are having them now. I know one thing, I'm going to love going gaga over them!

I got into a slight discussion with a friend (the friend that I find frustrating at the moment) on "having a baby" and we have "opposing" feelings about it, which is not a bad thing obviously, I always respect people's opinion and never force my own upon them, but I just wish they would do the same.

The issue: In the US, it's become more and more common that births have invasive medical intervention involved, such as c-sections, etc. Ricki Lake, made a film about this, The Business of Being Born. I haven't seen it, so I can't really say anything in terms of what was presented, but I was told what the documentary mentioned. From what I can tell, it was Ricki Lake giving birth in a bath tub at home. I think it was supposed to bring to light home birthing vs. hospital birthing (in some ways analogous to natural vs medical intervention).

Now while I'm not in a relationship, I know that I want kids in the future (2-4) depending on how I feel after the second, and I haven't given thought on how I was going to give birth. My friend on the other hand is married and though she isn't planning on getting preggers anytime soon, saw the documentary and is strongly of the opinion that hospitals should not be intervening as much. I'm not sure if that means she wants to have a home birth, etc.

I mentioned that one of my other friends (who was late) was going to be induced, then didn't because she went into natural labor, but then had a c-section and finally a healthy (BIG, close to 9 lbs) baby entered the world. My friend said "See! Medical intervention". I didn't try to say anything other than "She's healthy, she's beautiful, that's all that really matters." Because really that's all that matters!

I do know one thing, I want to give birth in a hospital and I'd like to try a natural birth obviously, but I'm not going to be against a c-section if that's the best for the baby and me. I would like that feeling of, if things get difficult, there are doctors to intervene, diagnose, and help. Through "personal" experience, someone close to me, due to lack of knowledge on the midwife's/doctor's part and lack of hospital facilities, etc, the baby did not survive.

If the technology and manpower is available, I'm going to take advantage of it, especially since I'm not a doctor myself. It's not like I'm going to elect to get a c-section, which I think is still controversial nowadays, but if something happens I will definitely take the doctor's advice into consideration for the health of the baby.

What's your viewpoint on this, would you avoid medical intervention at all costs, have the baby by midwife or at home? Have any of you seen the documentary?

7 comments:

the girl in stiletto said...

i've seen deliveries myself & i've involved in a few. i know it may be a biased opinion, coming from someone from the medical field itself, but to be honest, if a person chooses to give birth at home, than that's fine. whatever you choose is really your decision.

having said that, the advantage of giving birth in the hospital is, if there's anything that goes wrong with the baby or the mother, the specialist doctors will be there to take matters into hand.

if there's no risk or whatsoever, the midwife will be helping to deliver the baby & they have experiences in dealing with deliveries as well as to ensure the baby is fine.

medical interventions are only deemed necessary when we (doctors) feel that there is something that needs to be intervened.

:) we don't like to do as much job as you may think we do. but we've made an oath to do no harm & to do everything for the patients' best interest.

i personally prefer to give birth in the hospital, simply because i don't want the bloods to stain my bedspread LOL. i'm kidding about the bedspread. :)

Moonjava said...

girl in stiletto: :), I was looking forward to see if you replied since I know you're in the medical field. I'm not against having home births either, it's whatever you believe in and what you decide on. I just feel more comfortable having a baby in the hospital because, just as you said, there are specialty doctors that I wouldn't have access to at home (unless they made emergency housecalls). :P

floreta said...

how funny. this is the 2nd pregnancy post i've seen recently! i am all for natural birth/less medical intervention, i think. midwives.. and what's that birthing coach called? etc. i'm not sure how i ultimately feel about it but maybe when i get there i'll know.. i think babies come after marriage too. :P

Bayjb said...

I personally feel that a c-section should only be done if it's a high-risk pregnancy. I don't think it should be used as a way to control when a baby will be born, etc.

Moonjava said...

floreta: :), natural birth is definitely good! And not all babies come after marriage. ;)

Bayjb: My friend posted her birth story, it was over 20 some odd hours of attempting things the natural way, then they figured out something was stuck and she could never be born naturally, therefore c-section was the only option. But yes, I agree with you there. I don't know why you would WANT an elective c-section.

Trixie said...

I have noticed babies and weddings galore! All my friends are either getting married, just got married or having a baby...I think it is great but it definately puts my singledom right in front of my face.

Moonjava said...

Trixie: :), being single has its perks though! One day at a time, and if love comes, love comes! (Preferably it'll make it's presence very apparent to me, maybe smack me in the head or something!)